Issue 1 | Physical Review Research, published 20 October 2026

When warming some superconductors makes them stronger

Peer-reviewed in Physical Review Research | Theory

It predicts a counter-intuitive and testable effect in known two-band superconductors and gives field scales an experiment can aim for.

Corrected on 23 October 2026

Our understanding

Superconductors carry electricity without any loss, and heat normally destroys this. A strong magnetic field destroys it too, by breaking up the electron pairs that carry the current. The authors calculate that in some superconductors with two groups of electrons, under such a strong field, warming weakens the pair-breaking more than the pairs themselves. Then a little heat makes the superconductor slightly stronger, by about 5 % in the field it can withstand. In the simplest superconductors this does not happen. They name MgB₂ and FeSe as test materials. It is a prediction, not yet a measurement.

The details

Qualitative sketch, not data: order parameter versus temperature. Without exchange field it falls monotonically. In a two-band superconductor with a Zeeman energy above the order parameter it first rises over a window and then falls to zero.
Qualitative sketch drawn for this newsletter (Quanticious, CC BY 4.0), not data, illustrating the mechanism described in the abstract of Wang, He and Ji, Phys. Rev. Research (2026), DOI 10.1103/6q41-1cxp.

Key number: Critical field raised by approximately 5 % at a small finite temperature (authors' estimate, no error bar), on the order of 1 to 2 T in MgB₂, in the limit of strongly coupled bands

What they did

Heat normally destroys superconductivity. A strong exchange field, a magnetic field that acts on the electron spins, also destroys it, by pulling apart the electron pairs that carry the supercurrent (the Zeeman effect). The authors analysed the free energy of thin superconducting films in a large in-plane magnetic field, which acts purely as an exchange field. They find that temperature does two things at once. It weakens the pairing through thermal excitations, and it also weakens the field’s pair-breaking. When the Zeeman energy is larger than the superconducting order parameter, the second effect can win, so warming makes the material more superconducting over a temperature window. In the simplest one-band s-wave case this does not happen, because the order parameter stays at full size and then drops abruptly to zero. In a two-band model it does happen, and a clear rise of the critical field appears only in a window of parameters where the two bands are suitably balanced. For MgB₂ and FeSe the authors estimate a rise of the critical field of about 5 % in the limit of strongly coupled bands, roughly 1 to 2 T in MgB₂ and a few tenths of a tesla in FeSe, measurable by transport and tunnelling on thin films.

Why it matters

It identifies a thermodynamic mechanism for a counter-intuitive effect and gives field scales that experiments can check. The authors note that earlier calculations showed a slight enhancement without singling it out. Large exchange fields can also arise when a thin superconductor sits next to a magnetic material (our inference).

What is still open

Will measurements on MgB₂ or FeSe films in strong in-plane fields show the predicted rise of about 5 % in the critical field, and how much smaller is it when the two bands are less tightly coupled?

The authors note: “although its quantitative magnitude decreases as the interband locking is weakened” (Sec. V, Summary and discussion)

Get next Monday’s issue.

Every Monday, five new papers as short picture series instead of formulas. For free.

More from issue 1